NJ School Data
← All schools

Urban Leadership Academy

Paterson City · Passaic County · Elementary school
Grades K–4 · was K–5 in 2006
Last reported enrollment in 2019-20 — no longer in the data since.
Page updated · data years vary by section

At a glance

What changed?

These measures follow the same rule on every school page, not a ranking of this school’s biggest changes. Each row names its evidence dates; trend rows do not describe every year in between.

These are descriptive measures from statewide NJDOE datasets, not a quality rating or an explanation of cause. Proficiency, attendance, and graduation figures use All Students; subgroup patterns may differ.

Enrollment, by grade

In its last year on record, 2019-20, it enrolled 91 students across grades K–4. That is 108 fewer than in 2006-07 (199) — the school had shrunk. Its biggest cohort is kindergarten.

students 050100150200Other4321K1998200320082013201820232025

Students enrolled in each grade each fall, stacked to the total — so the top edge is total enrollment. Bands run from the lowest grade (light) to the highest (dark); a band that appears or disappears is a grade the school added or dropped. “Other” is students with no grade level (mostly special education), so the bands always sum to total. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

What the school looks like

In 2006-07, 91% of students were Black. By 2019-20 the largest group was Hispanic, at 56%.

% of students 050100race categories: 5 → 756%42%1998200320082013201820232025
WhiteBlackHispanicAsianTwo or more

Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How much the mix changed

Between 2015-16 and 2019-20 the makeup of this school shifted noticeably.

That’s the eighth-largest shift among the district’s 14 elementary schools — larger than 61% of Passaic County elementary schools. The district as a whole shifted just 3 over the same years, making this school an outlier. The biggest moves, in percentage points:
Hispanic +6·Black −5.3·Asian +2.2

The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →

Free or reduced-price lunch

In 2019-20, 71.4% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.

% certified 05010083%74.6%71.4%2006201120162019
This schooldistrict overalldistrict elementary schools

Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter lines show the district overall and the district elementary schools, for comparison. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism

In 2018-19, 18.4% of students were chronically absent — missing at least 10% of school days — down from 19.6% in 2015-16.

% chronically absent 0153027.6%18.4%2015201620172018
This schooldistrict overall

Chronic absenteeism — the share of students who missed 10% or more of the days they were enrolled (roughly 18 days across a full school year). The lighter line shows the district overall, for comparison. Points from 2018-19 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

How the state has judged this school

The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.

New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.

2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC

New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this school, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.

2016 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Urban Leadership Academy in the 2016 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language Arts/LiteracyMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMet, with participation averaging applied YES*7.7%39 scoredMet, with participation averaging applied YES*20.5%39 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
BlackToo few students -6.7%15 scoredToo few students -26.7%15 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMet, with participation averaging applied YES*7.7%39 scoredMet, with participation averaging applied YES*20.5%39 scored
English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this editionToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
HispanicToo few students -9.5%21 scoredToo few students -14.3%21 scored
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%4 scoredToo few students -25%4 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%3 scoredToo few students -33.3%3 scored
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2015 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2015 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Urban Leadership Academy in the 2015 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMet YES1.9%53 scoredMet YES1.9%53 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
BlackToo few students -0%26 scoredToo few students -0%26 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES2.1%48 scoredMet YES2.1%48 scored
HispanicToo few students -4.3%23 scoredToo few students -0%23 scored
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%3 scoredToo few students -0%3 scored
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%8 scoredToo few students -0%8 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%4 scoredToo few students -25%4 scored
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2014 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

The regime changes here. Above this line the state judged participation alone; below it, participation and performance against an individually set target, on a different test. A determination on one side of this line cannot be compared with one on the other, so nothing on this page draws a line through it.

2012 – 2014 · progress targets, on NJASK and HSPA

Each group large enough to score was measured against a progress target set for it individually, on NJASK and HSPA. These three years are comparable with each other. Most cells are empty by design — a group below the state’s minimum size got no determination at all. YES* never means the target was met. In these editions it marks a group that missed the printed target and was credited inside a 95% confidence interval, and it appears in the performance column.

2014 unmarked

This edition asserts nothing about whether it is preliminary or final, so neither does this page. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Urban Leadership Academy in the 2014 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES31.8%44 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 43.9Met YES59.1%44 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 62.6
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES29.2%41 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 44Met YES56.1%41 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 63.2
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES29.2%41 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 42.3Met YES58.5%41 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 60.9
HispanicToo few students -66.7%3 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%3 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%2 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%2 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2013 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2013 final

New Jersey labelled this edition final. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Urban Leadership Academy in the 2013 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES43.5%46 scoredMet its target YEStarget 37.6Met YES74%46 scoredMet its target YEStarget 58.4
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES38.5%39 scoredMet its target YEStarget 37.8Met YES71.8%39 scoredMet its target YEStarget 59.1
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES39.4%38 scoredMet its target YEStarget 35.9Met YES73.6%38 scoredMet its target YEStarget 56.6
HispanicToo few students -71.4%7 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -85.8%7 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2012 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2012 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Urban Leadership Academy in the 2012 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupLanguage Arts LiteracyMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES30.9%55 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 31.3Met YES50.9%55 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 54.2
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES28.3%53 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 31.6Met YES49.1%53 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 55
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES23.9%46 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 29.5Met YES45.6%46 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 52.3
HispanicToo few students -100%2 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%2 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -

The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this school’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this school does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.

How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →

Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →