NJ School Data
← All schools

School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism

Paterson · Passaic County · High school
Grades 9–12
Last reported enrollment in 2020-21 — no longer in the data since.
Page updated · data years vary by section

At a glance

What changed?

These measures follow the same rule on every school page, not a ranking of this school’s biggest changes. Each row names its evidence dates; trend rows do not describe every year in between.

These are descriptive measures from statewide NJDOE datasets, not a quality rating or an explanation of cause. Proficiency, attendance, and graduation figures use All Students; subgroup patterns may differ.

Enrollment, by grade

In its last year on record, 2020-21, it enrolled 653 students across grades 9–12. That is 50 more than in 2010-11 (603) — the school had grown. It peaked at 777 in 2017-18. Its biggest cohort is grade 10.

students 0200400600800Other12111091998200320082013201820232025

Students enrolled in each grade each fall, stacked to the total — so the top edge is total enrollment. Bands run from the lowest grade (light) to the highest (dark); a band that appears or disappears is a grade the school added or dropped. “Other” is students with no grade level (mostly special education), so the bands always sum to total. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

What the school looks like

The largest group in both 2010-11 and 2020-21 was Hispanic students — 63% then, 75% now.

% of students 050100race categories: 5 → 775%25%1998200320082013201820232025
WhiteBlackHispanicAsianTwo or moreNative Am.

Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How much the mix changed

Between 2016-17 and 2020-21 the makeup of this school shifted noticeably.

That’s the fourth-largest shift among the district’s 14 high schools — larger than 84% of Passaic County high schools. The district as a whole shifted just 1.7 over the same years, making this school an outlier. The biggest moves, in percentage points:
Hispanic +9.5·Black −8.7·White −0.6

The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →

Free or reduced-price lunch

In 2020-21, 61.7% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.

% certified 05010061.8%61.7%55%201020152020
This schooldistrict overalldistrict high schools

Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter lines show the district overall and the district high schools, for comparison. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

Graduation rate

In 2020-21, 75.6% of students graduated within four years — up from 67% in 2012-13.

% graduating 608010090.6%79.4%75.6%20122014201620182020
This schooldistrict overallNew Jersey

† New Jersey says these years are not comparable with the ones beside them

  • 2019-20 — graduation assessment requirement waived. Graduation assessment requirements were waived for any 12th grade student who was expected to graduate in the class of 2020 but, as of March 18, 2020, had not yet met the graduation assessment requirement. Additionally, the requirement to report on status in meeting annual ESSA targets was waived for 2019-2020. As a result, annual targets and status in meeting those targets are not reported for Cohort 2019 4-year and Cohort 2018 5-year graduation rates (NJDOE uses prior year graduation rates for accountability purposes). NJDOE 2019-20 workbook notes sheet.
  • 2020-21 — graduation assessment requirement waived. Graduation assessment requirements were waived for any 12th grade student who had not yet met the graduation assessment requirements, but had met all credit, curriculum, and attendance requirements for graduation. Additionally, the requirement to report on status in meeting annual ESSA targets was waived for 2020-2021. As a result, annual targets and status in meeting those targets are not reported for Cohort 2020 4-year and Cohort 2019 5-year graduation rates. NJDOE 2020-21 workbook notes sheet.

Four-year graduation rate — the share of a class that finishes within four years of entering ninth grade (New Jersey’s state calculation). The lighter lines show the district overall and New Jersey, for comparison. The record runs from 2012-13 to 2020-21, assembled from ten annual workbooks: the current one publishes five graduating classes, and the nine before it publish the rest. The figures for 2012-13 and 2013-14 are printed to the whole percent: that is how the 2015-16 workbook published them, and it is the only edition that does. The statewide line starts in 2018-19, because that is the first edition in which NJDOE printed a statewide rate beside each school’s own. Points from 2017-18 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

Chronic absenteeism

In 2020-21, 44.8% of students were chronically absent — missing at least 10% of school days — up from 28.8% in 2015-16.

% chronically absent 03060notcollectedthis year44.8%28.4%201520162017201820192020
This schooldistrict overall

† New Jersey says these years are not comparable with the ones beside them

  • 2020-21 — in-person and remote days differed. The requirement to report status in meeting annual ESSA targets for 2020-2021 was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report state averages and whether state averages were met for 2020-2021. Additionally, because the number of days students spent in in-person and remote learning environments during the school year differed, the NJDOE recommends caution in comparing 2020-2021 attendance data between schools and districts and to prior or future school years. NJDOE 2020-21 workbook notes sheet.

2019-20 is blank because New Jersey collected no attendance data that year, not because nobody was absent. The requirement to report on chronic absenteeism and related accountability measures for the 2019-2020 school year was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report on chronic absenteeism and other attendance data for 2019-2020. Tables showing attendance data will be hidden in the 2019-2020 reports. NJDOE 2019-20 workbook notes sheet.

Chronic absenteeism — the share of students who missed 10% or more of the days they were enrolled (roughly 18 days across a full school year). The lighter line shows the district overall, for comparison. Points from 2018-19 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

How the state has judged this school

2016-17 – 2018-19 · the ESSA record

New Jersey has published a summative rating for School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism in three school years under ESSA. The rating is a percentile inside a group of schools NJDOE considers comparable — where the school placed among them, not a score and not a grade.

NJDOE weighted the indicators the same way for high schools in every one of these editions, 2016-17 to 2018-19, so these three ratings may be read as one line.

percentile in group0255075100102016-172017-182018-19

Higher is further up: the line is the share of similar New Jersey schools this school placed above, in each year NJDOE ranked it. The axis runs the full 0 to 100 because a percentile’s whole range is real. This is a position, not a level. Every number NJDOE puts into the rating is itself a ranking against that year’s other schools — each indicator score is a percentile before it is weighted — so a year in which every school in the state improved would look exactly like a year in which none did. What the line can show is where this school sat among its contemporaries; what it cannot show is whether the contemporaries moved. The summative score behind each point is in the table below. Where the line stops and starts again, the state changed the calculation and the two stretches are not comparable; where the panel is shaded, nothing was calculated at all.

The long numbers are NJDOE’s own. It rounded the summative score in the 2016-17 preliminary edition, stopped rounding for the 2016-17 final through 2018-19, and rounded again from 2021-22 on. This page prints what each edition printed and shortens nothing.

Every ESSA accountability workbook that carries a row for School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism, most recent first, exactly as NJDOE published it.
School yearPercentile in groupSummative scoreNJDOE’s groupIdentification
2018-199.85915492957746416.29492424852085HighNot an identification year
2017-18 final11.7478510028653317.494791807013918HighNo comprehensive or targeted status published for this school
2016-17 final8.45070422535211212.916690928324662HighNo comprehensive or targeted status published for this school
NJDOE published 2016-17 twice. The preliminary edition below measures the same school year as the final one above it, with seven indicators instead of eight — Progress toward ELP was, in the state’s January 2018 words, “not yet available”. Every one of the 2,105 summative scores moved between the two. It is one year, not two, and the preliminary edition is comparable with nothing.
2016-17 preliminary12.1114.32HighNo comprehensive or targeted status published for this school

Everything below this line is a different instrument. Above, one weighted number and a rank inside a group of similar schools, under ESSA. Below, a pass-or-fail determination the state made about each student group, on tests that no longer exist, under a federal waiver that has since ended. The two regimes meet without a gap — 2015-16 is the last waiver year and 2016-17 the first ESSA one — and there is still no fair comparison between them, so this page does not draw one.

The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.

New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.

2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC

New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this school, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.

2016 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism in the 2016 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language Arts/LiteracyMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMet YES16.6%361 scoredMet YES2.5%366 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
BlackMet YES8.5%130 scoredMet YES0%132 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES16.6%361 scoredMet YES2.5%366 scored
English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this editionMet YES0%36 scoredMet YES2.8%36 scored
HispanicMet YES21.3%225 scoredMet YES3.9%228 scored
Students with DisabilitiesMet YES0%73 scoredMet YES0%74 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
WhiteToo few students -25%4 scoredToo few students -0%4 scored
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2015 four-year bar or the 2014 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2015 four-year cohort, ≥81%2014 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
BlackMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
English Language LearnersMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
HispanicMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
Students with DisabilitiesMissed NOToo few students -Missed NO

2015 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism in the 2015 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMissed NO11.2%278 scoredMissed NO2.6%274 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
BlackMissed NO8.4%83 scoredMissed NO2.5%81 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NO9.6%250 scoredMissed NO2.8%249 scored
HispanicMissed NO12.1%190 scoredMissed NO2.7%187 scored
Limited English ProficiencyMet, with participation averaging applied YES*0%33 scoredMissed NO0%29 scored
Students with DisabilitiesMissed NO0%42 scoredMissed NO2%49 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
WhiteToo few students -25%4 scoredToo few students -0%5 scored
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2014 four-year bar or the 2013 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2014 four-year cohort, ≥78%2013 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
BlackMet YESMet YES
Economically DisadvantagedMet YESMet YES
HispanicMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
Limited English ProficiencyMet YESMet YES
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -

The regime changes here. Above this line the state judged participation alone; below it, participation and performance against an individually set target, on a different test. A determination on one side of this line cannot be compared with one on the other, so nothing on this page draws a line through it.

2012 – 2014 · progress targets, on NJASK and HSPA

Each group large enough to score was measured against a progress target set for it individually, on NJASK and HSPA. These three years are comparable with each other. Most cells are empty by design — a group below the state’s minimum size got no determination at all. YES* never means the target was met. In these editions it marks a group that missed the printed target and was credited inside a 95% confidence interval, and it appears in the performance column.

2014 unmarked

This edition asserts nothing about whether it is preliminary or final, so neither does this page. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism in the 2014 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES68.7%99 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 68.9Met YES50.5%99 scoredMet its target YEStarget 46.7
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES73%37 scoredLarge enough to score, but no target was ever set --Met YES48.6%37 scoredMet its target YEStarget 41.6
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES69.1%81 scoredMet its target YEStarget 68.4Met YES50.6%81 scoredMet its target YEStarget 45.6
HispanicMet YES65.6%61 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 67.7Met YES50.8%61 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 51.7
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -38.1%21 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -85.7%21 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -33.3%15 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -6.7%15 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2013 four-year bar or the 2012 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2013 four-year cohort, ≥78%2012 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
BlackMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
HispanicMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO

On this page NJDOE printed a determination token that appears in no legend it published in one place. Those cells are shown exactly as published and are corrected from nothing.

2013 final

New Jersey labelled this edition final. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism in the 2013 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES73.3%60 scoredMet its target YEStarget 65.8Met YES55.7%61 scoredMet its target YEStarget 41.4
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackToo few students -69%29 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -43.3%30 scoredMet its target YEStarget 35.8
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES70.6%51 scoredMet its target YEStarget 65.2Met YES53.8%52 scoredMet its target YEStarget 40.1
HispanicToo few students -77.4%31 scoredMet its target YEStarget 64.5Too few students -67.7%31 scoredMet its target YEStarget 46.8
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%4 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%4 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -43.8%16 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -18.8%16 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2012 four-year bar or the 2011 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2012 four-year cohort, ≥75%2011 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
BlackMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO
HispanicMissed NOMissed NOMissed NO

2012 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about School Of Culinary Arts Hospitality And Tourism in the 2012 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupLanguage Arts LiteracyMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES60.8%79 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES46.8%79 scoredToo few students to determine -
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackToo few students -56%25 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -32%25 scoredToo few students to determine -
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES67.6%71 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES50.7%71 scoredToo few students to determine -
HispanicMissed NO64.2%53 scoredToo few students to determine -Missed NO54.7%53 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -33.3%15 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -60%15 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -14.3%14 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%14 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -

The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this school’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this school does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.

How the ESSA record works →  ·  How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →

Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →