At a glance
These measures follow the same rule on every school page, not a ranking of this school’s biggest changes. Each row names its evidence dates; trend rows do not describe every year in between.
Fall enrollment was 526 students in 2021-22 and 6 students in 2022-23 — 520 fewer students.
See enrollment evidence →The chronic-absence rate was 22.3% in 2016-17 and 32.8% in 2021-22 — 10.5 percentage points higher.
See attendance evidence →These are descriptive measures from statewide NJDOE datasets, not a quality rating or an explanation of cause. Proficiency, attendance, and graduation figures use All Students; subgroup patterns may differ.
In its last year on record, 2022-23, it enrolled 6 students across grades 9–12. That is 932 fewer than in 1998-99 (938) — the school had shrunk. It peaked at 1,013 in 2003-04.
Total students enrolled each fall. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.
In 1998-99, 67% of students were White. By 2022-23 the largest group was Black, at 83%.
Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.
Between 2018-19 and 2022-23 the makeup of this school transformed.
The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). At a school this small, a few students moving can swing the index a lot. It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →
In 2022-23, 0% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.
Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter lines show the district overall and Millville High School, for comparison. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.
In 2021-22, 32.8% of students were chronically absent — missing at least 10% of school days — up from 22.3% in 2016-17.
† New Jersey says these years are not comparable with the ones beside them
The requirement to report status in meeting annual ESSA targets for 2020-2021 was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report state averages and whether state averages were met for 2020-2021. Additionally, because the number of days students spent in in-person and remote learning environments during the school year differed, the NJDOE recommends caution in comparing 2020-2021 attendance data between schools and districts and to prior or future school years.NJDOE 2020-21 workbook notes sheet.
2019-20 is blank because New Jersey collected no attendance data that year, not because nobody was absent. The requirement to report on chronic absenteeism and related accountability measures for the 2019-2020 school year was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report on chronic absenteeism and other attendance data for 2019-2020. Tables showing attendance data will be hidden in the 2019-2020 reports.
NJDOE 2019-20 workbook notes sheet.
Chronic absenteeism — the share of students who missed 10% or more of the days they were enrolled (roughly 18 days across a full school year). The lighter line shows the district overall, for comparison. Points from 2018-19 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.
2021-22 · the ESSA record
New Jersey’s ESSA calculation workbooks carry a row for Memorial High School, but no summative rating in any of them. What the workbooks did publish about it is below.
The workbook rows here, 2021-22, carry no rating at all.
| School year | Percentile in group | Summative score | NJDOE’s group | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Published blank | — | High | No comprehensive or targeted status published for this school |
Everything below this line is a different instrument. Above, one weighted number and a rank inside a group of similar schools, under ESSA. Below, a pass-or-fail determination the state made about each student group, on tests that no longer exist, under a federal waiver that has since ended. The two regimes meet without a gap — 2015-16 is the last waiver year and 2016-17 the first ESSA one — and there is still no fair comparison between them, so this page does not draw one.
The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.
New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.
2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC
New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this school, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.
| Student group | English Language Arts/Literacy | Mathematics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participation | % meeting standards | Participation | % meeting standards | |
| Schoolwide | Met YES | 25.9%432 scored | Missed NO | 9.5%434 scored |
| American Indian | Too few students - | 0%0 scored | Too few students - | 0%0 scored |
| Asian | Too few students - | 50%4 scored | Too few students - | 25%4 scored |
| Black | Met YES | 17.2%151 scored | Missed NO | 3.3%150 scored |
| Economically Disadvantaged | Missed NO | 20%250 scored | Missed NO | 5.3%264 scored |
| English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this edition | Too few students - | 0%1 scored | Too few students - | 0%0 scored |
| Hispanic | Met YES | 15.2%79 scored | Met YES | 9.8%82 scored |
| Students with Disabilities | Missed NO | 12.9%93 scored | Missed NO | 5.4%93 scored |
| Two or More Races | Too few students - | 100%2 scored | Too few students - | 0%2 scored |
| White | Missed NO | 35.7%196 scored | Missed NO | 13.8%196 scored |
| Student group | 2015 four-year cohort, ≥81% | 2014 five-year cohort, ≥85% | Graduation-rate indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | Too few students - | — | — |
| Black | Too few students - | — | Too few students - |
| Economically Disadvantaged | Too few students - | — | — |
| Hispanic | Too few students - | — | — |
| Students with Disabilities | Too few students - | — | — |
| White | Too few students - | — | — |
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participation | % meeting standards | Participation | % meeting standards | |
| Schoolwide | Missed NO | 25.3%260 scored | Missed NO | 8.5%306 scored |
| American Indian | Too few students - | 100%1 scored | Too few students - | 0%0 scored |
| Asian | Too few students - | 66.7%3 scored | Too few students - | 100%1 scored |
| Black | Missed NO | 7.5%80 scored | Missed NO | 5.1%99 scored |
| Economically Disadvantaged | Missed NO | 17.1%176 scored | Missed NO | 6.3%208 scored |
| Hispanic | Missed NO | 20.3%59 scored | Missed NO | 3.6%56 scored |
| Limited English Proficiency | Too few students - | 0%0 scored | Too few students - | 0%0 scored |
| Students with Disabilities | Missed NO | 8.3%36 scored | Missed NO | 0%49 scored |
| Two or More Races | Too few students - | 100%1 scored | Too few students - | 25%4 scored |
| White | Missed NO | 37.9%116 scored | Missed NO | 11.6%146 scored |
| Student group | 2014 four-year cohort, ≥78% | 2013 five-year cohort, ≥85% | Graduation-rate indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | Too few students - | — | — |
| Black | Too few students - | — | Too few students - |
| Economically Disadvantaged | Too few students - | — | — |
| Hispanic | Too few students - | — | — |
| Students with Disabilities | Too few students - | — | — |
| White | Too few students - | — | — |
The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this school’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this school does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.
How the ESSA record works → · How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →
Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →