NJ School Data
← All schools

Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms

Trenton · Mercer County · Middle school
Grades 6–8 · was K–8 in 2006
Last reported enrollment in 2021-22 — no longer in the data since.
Page updated · data years vary by section

At a glance

What changed?

These measures follow the same rule on every school page, not a ranking of this school’s biggest changes. Each row names its evidence dates; trend rows do not describe every year in between.

These are descriptive measures from statewide NJDOE datasets, not a quality rating or an explanation of cause. Proficiency, attendance, and graduation figures use All Students; subgroup patterns may differ.

Enrollment over time

In its last year on record, 2021-22, it enrolled 500 students. That is 89 more than in 1998-99 (411) — the school had grown. It peaked at 533 in 2009-10.

students 0150300450600 5001998200320082013201820232025

Total students enrolled each fall. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

What the school looks like

The largest group in both 1998-99 and 2021-22 was Black students — 87% then, 60% now.

% of students 050100race categories: 5 → 737%60%1998200320082013201820232025
WhiteBlackHispanicAsianTwo or moreNative Am.

Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How much the mix changed

Between 2017-18 and 2021-22 the makeup of this school shifted noticeably.

That’s a larger shift than 73% of Mercer County middle schools. That roughly tracks the district overall (10.1) — a district-wide change more than a school-specific one. The biggest moves, in percentage points:
Black −10.9·Hispanic +10.6

The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →

Free or reduced-price lunch

In 2021-22, 58.6% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.

% certified 050100notreported58.6%48.2%39.8%199820032008201320182021
This schooldistrict overalldistrict middle schools

Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter lines show the district overall and the district middle schools, for comparison. Years the state did not report are shaded. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

Chronic absenteeism

In 2021-22, 38.1% of students were chronically absent — missing at least 10% of school days — up from 28.9% in 2015-16.

% chronically absent 04080notcollectedthis year38.1%37.5%2015201720192021
This schooldistrict overall

† New Jersey says these years are not comparable with the ones beside them

  • 2020-21 — in-person and remote days differed. The requirement to report status in meeting annual ESSA targets for 2020-2021 was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report state averages and whether state averages were met for 2020-2021. Additionally, because the number of days students spent in in-person and remote learning environments during the school year differed, the NJDOE recommends caution in comparing 2020-2021 attendance data between schools and districts and to prior or future school years. NJDOE 2020-21 workbook notes sheet.

2019-20 is blank because New Jersey collected no attendance data that year, not because nobody was absent. The requirement to report on chronic absenteeism and related accountability measures for the 2019-2020 school year was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report on chronic absenteeism and other attendance data for 2019-2020. Tables showing attendance data will be hidden in the 2019-2020 reports. NJDOE 2019-20 workbook notes sheet.

Chronic absenteeism — the share of students who missed 10% or more of the days they were enrolled (roughly 18 days across a full school year). The lighter line shows the district overall, for comparison. The current workbook publishes four years of this measure; the years before them come from each earlier year’s own workbook, which publish the same figures wherever the two overlap. Points from 2018-19 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

How the state has judged this school

2016-17 – 2021-22 · the ESSA record

New Jersey has published a summative rating for Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms in four school years under ESSA. The rating is a percentile inside a group of schools NJDOE considers comparable — where the school placed among them, not a score and not a grade.

NJDOE weighted the indicators the same way for elementary and middle schools in every one of these editions, 2016-17 to 2021-22, so these four ratings may be read as one line.

percentile in group0255075100waivednothing wascalculated102016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-22

Higher is further up: the line is the share of similar New Jersey schools this school placed above, in each year NJDOE ranked it. The axis runs the full 0 to 100 because a percentile’s whole range is real. This is a position, not a level. Every number NJDOE puts into the rating is itself a ranking against that year’s other schools — each indicator score is a percentile before it is weighted — so a year in which every school in the state improved would look exactly like a year in which none did. What the line can show is where this school sat among its contemporaries; what it cannot show is whether the contemporaries moved. The summative score behind each point is in the table below. Where the line stops and starts again, the state changed the calculation and the two stretches are not comparable; where the panel is shaded, nothing was calculated at all.

The long numbers are NJDOE’s own. It rounded the summative score in the 2016-17 preliminary edition, stopped rounding for the 2016-17 final through 2018-19, and rounded again from 2021-22 on. This page prints what each edition printed and shortens nothing.

Every ESSA accountability workbook that carries a row for Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms, most recent first, exactly as NJDOE published it.
School yearPercentile in groupSummative scoreNJDOE’s groupIdentification
2021-229.521.55ElementaryNo comprehensive or targeted status published for this school
2020-21No summative rating was calculated for any school in New Jersey.
2019-20No summative rating was calculated for any school in New Jersey.
2018-194.52111838191552614.488408686833248ES/MSNot an identification year
2017-18 final3.258293838862559511.975759496049776ES/MSComprehensive
2016-17 final1.94117647058823559.785292808056601ES/MSComprehensive
NJDOE published 2016-17 twice. The preliminary edition below measures the same school year as the final one above it, with seven indicators instead of eight — Progress toward ELP was, in the state’s January 2018 words, “not yet available”. Every one of the 2,105 summative scores moved between the two. It is one year, not two, and the preliminary edition is comparable with nothing.
2016-17 preliminary2.419.79ElementaryComprehensive

2019-20 and 2020-21 · nothing was calculated

These are not years missing from this record. The federal government waived New Jersey’s ESSA accountability requirements for both of them, and no summative rating exists for any school in the state. In NJDOE’s own words:

due to the COVID-19 pandemic, New Jersey was approved for both a March 2020 waiver and a March 2021 waiver that removed accountability-related requirements under ESSA for the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years, respectively. The waived requirements included the: Calculation of indicator scores and summative scores; Measurement of progress toward long-term goals and measures of interim progress for accountability indicators; and Identification of schools for comprehensive and targeted support and improvement based on data from these two school years.

2021-2022 Technical Guide to ESSA Summative Ratings and the Identification of Schools in Need of Support and Improvement, NJDOE April 2023, page 3

Everything below this line is a different instrument. Above, one weighted number and a rank inside a group of similar schools, under ESSA. Below, a pass-or-fail determination the state made about each student group, on tests that no longer exist, under a federal waiver that has since ended. The two regimes meet without a gap — 2015-16 is the last waiver year and 2016-17 the first ESSA one — and there is still no fair comparison between them, so this page does not draw one.

The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.

New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.

2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC

New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this school, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.

2016 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms in the 2016 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language Arts/LiteracyMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMissed NO15.4%422 scoredMissed NO4%426 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
BlackMissed NO15%327 scoredMissed NO3%330 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NO16.3%367 scoredMissed NO4.3%370 scored
English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this editionToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%2 scored
HispanicMet, with participation averaging applied YES*17%88 scoredMet, with participation averaging applied YES*6.7%89 scored
Students with DisabilitiesMissed NO12.5%88 scoredMissed NO6.6%91 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
WhiteToo few students -16.7%6 scoredToo few students -16.7%6 scored

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2015 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2015 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms in the 2015 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMissed NO13.6%207 scoredMissed NO3.4%205 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
BlackMissed NO12.6%160 scoredMissed NO2.5%158 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NO14.1%170 scoredMissed NO4.2%167 scored
HispanicMet, with participation averaging applied YES*18.6%43 scoredMet, with participation averaging applied YES*7%43 scored
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
Students with DisabilitiesMissed NO8.5%47 scoredMissed NO0%45 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
WhiteToo few students -0%4 scoredToo few students -0%4 scored

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2014 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It did not meet it — the page prints NO, Missed.

The regime changes here. Above this line the state judged participation alone; below it, participation and performance against an individually set target, on a different test. A determination on one side of this line cannot be compared with one on the other, so nothing on this page draws a line through it.

2012 – 2014 · progress targets, on NJASK and HSPA

Each group large enough to score was measured against a progress target set for it individually, on NJASK and HSPA. These three years are comparable with each other. Most cells are empty by design — a group below the state’s minimum size got no determination at all. YES* never means the target was met. In these editions it marks a group that missed the printed target and was credited inside a 95% confidence interval, and it appears in the performance column.

2014 unmarked

This edition asserts nothing about whether it is preliminary or final, so neither does this page. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms in the 2014 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES24.5%405 scoredMet its target YEStarget 20.7Met YES21.4%411 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 25.5
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -66.6%3 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -66.6%3 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES23.6%313 scoredMet its target YEStarget 21.7Met YES17.9%318 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 30.7
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES22.6%346 scoredMet its target YEStarget 20.4Met YES21.5%350 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 26.7
HispanicMet YES25.3%83 scoredMet its target YEStarget 18.8Met YES32.2%84 scoredMet its target YEStarget 18.9
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%7 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -28.6%7 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesMissed NO7.8%90 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 16.6Met YES13.3%90 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 17.8
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -33.3%6 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -33.4%6 scoredToo few students to determine -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2013 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It did not meet it — the page prints NO, Missed.

2013 final

New Jersey labelled this edition final. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms in the 2013 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMissed NO4.9%163 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 12.8Missed NO10.5%153 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 18
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMissed NO6.1%98 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 13.9Missed NO16.7%90 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 23.7
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES4.4%114 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 12.4Missed NO12.1%107 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 19.4
HispanicMet YES2.6%39 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 10.7Missed NO2.7%37 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 10.8
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesMissed NO0%76 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 8.3Missed NO1.4%72 scoredMissed its target NOtarget 9.6
Two or More RacesToo few students -4.2%24 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%24 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%2 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%2 scoredToo few students to determine -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this school’s 2012 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole school and not by student group. It did not meet it — the page prints NO, Missed.

2012 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Luis Munoz-Rivera Ms in the 2012 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupLanguage Arts LiteracyMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMissed NO12.3%73 scoredToo few students to determine -Missed NO5.8%69 scoredToo few students to determine -
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMissed NO10.3%39 scoredToo few students to determine -Missed NO2.7%37 scoredToo few students to determine -
Economically DisadvantagedMissed NO8.2%49 scoredToo few students to determine -Missed NO6.4%47 scoredToo few students to determine -
HispanicToo few students -7.1%14 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -14.3%14 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%27 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -3.7%27 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -21.1%19 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -5.9%17 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -

The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this school’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this school does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.

How the ESSA record works →  ·  How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →

Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →