NJ School Data
← All schools

Alternative High School

Cherry Hill · Camden County · High school
Grades 9–12
Last reported enrollment in 2023-24 — no longer in the data since.
Page updated · data years vary by section

At a glance

What changed?

These measures follow the same rule on every school page, not a ranking of this school’s biggest changes. Each row names its evidence dates; trend rows do not describe every year in between.

These are descriptive measures from statewide NJDOE datasets, not a quality rating or an explanation of cause. Proficiency, attendance, and graduation figures use All Students; subgroup patterns may differ.

Enrollment over time

In its last year on record, 2023-24, it enrolled 32 students. That is 135 fewer than in 1998-99 (167) — the school had shrunk.

students 050100150200 321998200320082013201820232025

Total students enrolled each fall. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

What the school looks like

The largest group in both 1998-99 and 2023-24 was White students — 75% then, 56% now.

% of students 050100race categories: 5 → 716%19%9%56%1998200320082013201820232025
WhiteBlackHispanicAsianTwo or moreNative Am.

Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How much the mix changed

Between 2019-20 and 2023-24 the makeup of this school changed substantially.

That’s the largest shift among the district’s three high schools — larger than 92% of Camden County high schools. The district as a whole shifted just 5 over the same years, making this school an outlier. The biggest moves, in percentage points:
White −6.2·Hispanic +6.2·Asian −6.2

The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →

Free or reduced-price lunch

In 2023-24, 37.5% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.

% certified 03060notreported37.5%26.4%20.2%199820032008201320182023
This schooldistrict overalldistrict high schools

Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter lines show the district overall and the district high schools, for comparison. Years the state did not report are shaded. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

Graduation rate

In 2016-17, 83.3% of students graduated within four years.

% graduating 7085100notreportednotreported94.1%91.1%83.3%20152017201920212022
This schooldistrict overallNew Jersey

Four-year graduation rate — the share of a class that finishes within four years of entering ninth grade (New Jersey’s state calculation). The lighter lines show the district overall and New Jersey, for comparison. The record runs from 2016-17 to 2016-17, assembled from ten annual workbooks: the current one publishes five graduating classes, and the nine before it publish the rest. The statewide line starts in 2018-19, because that is the first edition in which NJDOE printed a statewide rate beside each school’s own. Points from 2016-17 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

Chronic absenteeism

In 2017-18, 54.3% of students were chronically absent — missing at least 10% of school days — up from 46.7% in 2015-16.

% chronically absent 03060notreported54.3%15.3%20152017201920212022
This schooldistrict overall

2019-20 is blank because New Jersey collected no attendance data that year, not because nobody was absent. The requirement to report on chronic absenteeism and related accountability measures for the 2019-2020 school year was waived. As a result, NJDOE will not report on chronic absenteeism and other attendance data for 2019-2020. Tables showing attendance data will be hidden in the 2019-2020 reports. NJDOE 2019-20 workbook notes sheet.

Chronic absenteeism — the share of students who missed 10% or more of the days they were enrolled (roughly 18 days across a full school year). The lighter line shows the district overall, for comparison. The current workbook publishes four years of this measure; the years before them come from each earlier year’s own workbook, which publish the same figures wherever the two overlap. Points from 2017-18 and earlier are matched to this school by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

How the state has judged this school

The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.

New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.

2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC

New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this school, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.

2016 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Alternative High School in the 2016 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language Arts/LiteracyMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideToo few students -0%3 scoredToo few students -0%3 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
BlackToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
Economically DisadvantagedToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this editionToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
HispanicToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%2 scoredToo few students -0%2 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
WhiteToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored

2015 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Alternative High School in the 2015 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideToo few students -0%5 scoredToo few students -0%3 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
BlackToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
Economically DisadvantagedToo few students -0%2 scoredToo few students -0%2 scored
HispanicToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%5 scoredToo few students -0%3 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
WhiteToo few students -0%4 scoredToo few students -0%2 scored

The regime changes here. Above this line the state judged participation alone; below it, participation and performance against an individually set target, on a different test. A determination on one side of this line cannot be compared with one on the other, so nothing on this page draws a line through it.

2012 – 2014 · progress targets, on NJASK and HSPA

Each group large enough to score was measured against a progress target set for it individually, on NJASK and HSPA. These three years are comparable with each other. Most cells are empty by design — a group below the state’s minimum size got no determination at all. YES* never means the target was met. In these editions it marks a group that missed the printed target and was credited inside a 95% confidence interval, and it appears in the performance column.

2014 unmarked

This edition asserts nothing about whether it is preliminary or final, so neither does this page. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Alternative High School in the 2014 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideToo few students -100%7 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -57.1%7 scoredToo few students to determine -
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Economically DisadvantagedToo few students -100%4 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -50%4 scoredToo few students to determine -
HispanicToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -100%7 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -57.1%7 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -100%4 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -75%4 scoredToo few students to determine -

2013 final

New Jersey labelled this edition final. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Alternative High School in the 2013 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideToo few students -87.5%8 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -44.4%9 scoredToo few students to determine -
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackToo few students -100%3 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%3 scoredToo few students to determine -
Economically DisadvantagedToo few students -85.7%7 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -28.6%7 scoredToo few students to determine -
HispanicToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -50%2 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -87.5%8 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -44.4%9 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -75%4 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -75%4 scoredToo few students to determine -

The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this school’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this school does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.

How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →

Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →