Washington Twp

Burlington County · 1 schools · 37 students

Grades PK–4 · was K–8 in 1998

Last reported enrollment in 2015-16 — no longer in the data since.

Page updated August 3, 2026 · data years vary by section

Enrollment over time

In its last year on record, 2015-16, it enrolled 37 students across grades PK–4. That is 63 fewer than in 1998-99 (100) — the district had shrunk. It peaked at 118 in 2000-01.

Total students enrolled each fall. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

What the district looks like

The largest group in both 1998-99 and 2015-16 was White students — 87% then, 92% now.

WhiteBlackHispanicAsian

Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How much the mix changed

Between 2011-12 and 2015-16 the makeup of this district barely moved.

3.7

Shift index

That’s a smaller shift than 65% of Burlington County districts. The biggest moves, in percentage points:

White −3.7·Hispanic +3.7

The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →

Free or reduced-price lunch

In 2015-16, 18.9% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.

This districtBurlington County

Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter line shows Burlington County, for comparison. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How many students have an IEP

NJDOE’s October 15, 2015 classification file carries a partial record for this district; every cell it published is in the table below, exactly as published. Across New Jersey, adding up every district in the same file gives 16.50% on the same count.

Withheld -

This district, October 15, 2015

16.50%

New Jersey, same count

What this number is not. A classification rate counts the students who had an IEP on one October day. It is not a count of how many students here need special education, and it is not a measure of the services they get. A rate above New Jersey’s can mean a district finds and identifies students that other districts miss, or that it classifies students another district would not; a rate below it can mean either of the opposite two things. This file cannot tell you which, and neither can this page.

Nothing here is evidence about staffing, spending, placement, out-of-district tuition, whether a program is appropriate, or whether the district is in compliance with anything. It is also not the special-education share in a district budget: that is a different count, of a different population, on a different date, and the two must not be subtracted from one another.

Some reporting units in this file are not ordinary districts. State-operated programs, county juvenile detention centers and specialized placements enroll students who were sent to them, which puts their rates far from the statewide figure for structural reasons rather than anything about how a district serves the children who live in it.

Every classification figure NJDOE has published for Washington Twp, newest first, each row on the counted population that edition used. The New Jersey column is our own sum of that edition's district rows on the same basis, not a figure NJDOE printed.
October count	Students counted	With an IEP	Rate	New Jersey
2015-16 †public and non-public students together	37	Withheld `-`	Withheld `-`	16.50%
2014-15 †public and non-public students together	41	3	7.32%	16.59%

About the oldest years. Rows marked † were matched to this district by NJDOE's district code, but our record of which districts existed does not reach back before August 2020. A match on those years confirms the code is in use today; it is not evidence that the entity behind it is the same district, and New Jersey has merged, split and regionalised districts across this span.

About the denominator. In most of these editions NJDOE headed the enrollment column General Ed. Enrollment or a variant of it, but the query the department published alongside the file counts every student aged 3 to 21 — students with IEPs included. The published rates only reconcile against that wider reading, so that is the denominator used here. Adding the IEP count back on would deflate every rate in the affected years.

What NJDOE publishes that is not in this workbook. The classification file answers one question — how many students had an IEP — and nothing else. It is not the only special-education file New Jersey publishes, and the others are not statewide-only:

Special Education Student Count — how many students have each disability. NJDOE publishes this by district in 11 of its editions, broken out by age, disability, gender, English-language status and race.
Education Environment (Placement) — how much of the day they spend in general-education classrooms. NJDOE publishes this by district in 11 of its editions, broken out by age, disability, gender, English-language status and race.
Exiting Special Education — how they leave special education. NJDOE publishes this by district in 11 of its editions, broken out by age, disability, gender, English-language status and race.

This site does not yet carry those figures. That is a gap in what we have loaded, not a gap in what the state publishes, and the difference matters if you came here looking for them.

Row LEA_Classification.xlsx#Sheet1!618 of NJDOE’s classification-rate workbook. How this data works →

Budget

In 2025-26, Washington Twp proposed a $2.2 million General Fund operating budget.

Operating revenue

Local sources$1.8 million 83%
State sources$229,326 10%
Fund balance / other$150,000 7%

Operating spending

Instruction and day-to-day operations$2.2 million 99%
Buildings, equipment, and other capital costs$18,840 <1%

These are proposed NJDOE User-Friendly Budget planning rows—not audited actuals, household tax bills, or all-funds totals.

Open the full budget report →

How the state has judged this district

The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.

New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.

2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC

New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this district, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.

2016 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Washington Twp in the 2016 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student group	English Language Arts/Literacy		Mathematics
Student group	Participation	% meeting standards	Participation	% meeting standards
Schoolwide	Too few students -	33.3%9 scored	Too few students -	66.7%9 scored
American Indian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Asian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Black	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Economically Disadvantaged	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this edition	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Hispanic	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Students with Disabilities	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Two or More Races	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
White	Too few students -	33.3%9 scored	Too few students -	66.7%9 scored

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this district’s 2015 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole district and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2015 preliminary

What New Jersey determined about Washington Twp in the 2015 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student group	English Language Arts		Mathematics
Student group	Participation	% meeting standards	Participation	% meeting standards
Schoolwide	Too few students -	12.5%8 scored	Too few students -	25%8 scored
American Indian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Asian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Black	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Economically Disadvantaged	Too few students -	0%2 scored	Too few students -	0%2 scored
Hispanic	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Limited English Proficiency	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
Students with Disabilities	Too few students -	0%1 scored	Too few students -	0%1 scored
Two or More Races	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students -	0%0 scored
White	Too few students -	12.5%8 scored	Too few students -	25%8 scored

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this district’s 2014 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole district and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

The regime changes here. Above this line the state judged participation alone; below it, participation and performance against an individually set target, on a different test. A determination on one side of this line cannot be compared with one on the other, so nothing on this page draws a line through it.

2012 – 2014 · progress targets, on NJASK and HSPA

Each group large enough to score was measured against a progress target set for it individually, on NJASK and HSPA. These three years are comparable with each other. Most cells are empty by design — a group below the state’s minimum size got no determination at all. YES* never means the target was met. In these editions it marks a group that missed the printed target and was credited inside a 95% confidence interval, and it appears in the performance column.

2014 unmarked

This edition asserts nothing about whether it is preliminary or final, so neither does this page. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about Washington Twp in the 2014 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student group	English Language Arts			Mathematics
Student group	Participation	% proficient	Performance	Participation	% proficient	Performance
Schoolwide	Too few students -	55.5%9 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	66.7%9 scored	Too few students to determine -
American Indian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Asian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Black	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Economically Disadvantaged	Too few students -	75%4 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	75%4 scored	Too few students to determine -
Hispanic	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Limited English Proficiency	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Students with Disabilities	Too few students -	0%1 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	100%1 scored	Too few students to determine -
Two or More Races	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
White	Too few students -	55.5%9 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	66.7%9 scored	Too few students to determine -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this district’s 2013 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole district and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2013 preliminary

What New Jersey determined about Washington Twp in the 2013 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student group	English Language Arts			Mathematics
Student group	Participation	% proficient	Performance	Participation	% proficient	Performance
Schoolwide	Too few students -	58.3%12 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	75%12 scored	Too few students to determine -
American Indian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Asian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Black	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Economically Disadvantaged	Too few students -	50%2 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	100%2 scored	Too few students to determine -
Hispanic	Too few students -	0%1 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	100%1 scored	Too few students to determine -
Limited English Proficiency	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Students with Disabilities	Too few students -	0%1 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	100%1 scored	Too few students to determine -
Two or More Races	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
White	Too few students -	63.6%11 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	72.7%11 scored	Too few students to determine -

Graduation rate, 2012 four-year cohort. This edition prints rates rather than determinations.
Student group	2012 four-year graduation rate
Schoolwide	—
American Indian	—
Asian	—
Black	—
Economically Disadvantaged	—
Hispanic	—
Limited English Proficiency	—
Students with Disabilities	—
Two or More Races	—
White	—

These are the rates the state printed, not determinations: this edition’s district profiles carry no YES or NO on graduation. Printed beside the block: “5yr Cohort Grad rate and Attendance rate will be included in Final District Profiles.” No final 2013 district profile was ever published.

2012 preliminary

What New Jersey determined about Washington Twp in the 2012 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student group	Language Arts Literacy			Mathematics
Student group	Participation	% proficient	Performance	Participation	% proficient	Performance
Schoolwide	Too few students -	60%15 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	86.7%15 scored	Too few students to determine -
American Indian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Asian	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Black	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Economically Disadvantaged	Too few students -	33.3%3 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	66.7%3 scored	Too few students to determine -
Hispanic	Too few students -	100%2 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	100%2 scored	Too few students to determine -
Limited English Proficiency	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
Students with Disabilities	Too few students -	50%2 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	50%2 scored	Too few students to determine -
Two or More Races	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	0%0 scored	Too few students to determine -
White	Too few students -	53.8%13 scored	Too few students to determine -	Too few students -	84.7%13 scored	Too few students to determine -

The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this district’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this district does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.

How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →

Schools in this district

The district’s 1 schools on record. Open any for its full profile.

Washington Twp. - Green Bank School →Elementary school · Grades PK–4 · 37 students

Every school the district has reported, with its grade span and its most recent fall head count; a school with no current-year count is shown as closed after its last one. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →