NJ School Data
← NJ School Data

M E T S Charter

Charter · 1 schools · 713 students
Grades 6–12 · was 6–9 in 2011
Last reported enrollment in 2019-20 — no longer in the data since.
Page updated · data years vary by section

Enrollment, by grade

In its last year on record, 2019-20, it enrolled 713 students across grades 6–12. That is 393 more than in 2011-12 (320) — the district had grown. Its biggest cohort is grade 9.

students 020040060080012111098761998200320082013201820232025

Students enrolled in each grade each fall, stacked to the total — so the top edge is total enrollment. Bands run from the lowest grade (light) to the highest (dark); a band that appears or disappears is a grade the school added or dropped. “Other” is students with no grade level (mostly special education), so the bands always sum to total. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

What the district looks like

The largest group in both 2011-12 and 2019-20 was Black students — 40% then, 48% now.

% of students 050100race categories: 5 → 743%48%1998200320082013201820232025
WhiteBlackHispanicAsianTwo or moreNative Am.

Each group’s share of enrollment over time, or its head count — toggle above. New Jersey expanded race and ethnicity reporting from five to seven categories in 2006-07 (dashed line), so “two or more races” appears only after; Asian here includes Pacific Islander. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How much the mix changed

Between 2015-16 and 2019-20 the makeup of this district shifted noticeably.

That’s a larger shift than 75% of New Jersey districts. The biggest moves, in percentage points:
Black +12·White −7.2·Asian −4.8

The index is half the sum of every group’s change in share, on a 0–100 scale (how it works). It is computed from the same counts as the makeup chart above — source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment. Compare any two years in the explorer →

Free or reduced-price lunch

In 2019-20, 70.7% of students were certified for free or reduced-price lunch.

% certified 05010070.7%69.9%201120162019
This districtstatewide

Share of students certified for free or reduced-price meals, through a household application or an automatic match. The lighter line shows the statewide, for comparison. Some districts serve free meals to every student under the Community Eligibility Provision. Those districts often stop collecting household income forms, so their reported share can run below the number of low-income students they enroll. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

How many students have an IEP

On October 15, 2019 NJDOE recorded 712 students in this district and 74 of them — 10.39% — had an individualized education program (IEP). That count is public school students only. Across New Jersey, adding up every district in the same file gives 16.66% on the same count.

10.39%
This district, October 15, 2019
16.66%
New Jersey, same count
% with an IEP10111213counted population changes2014-152016-172019-20

Public school students only — 2019-20 onwardPublic and non-public together — a wider count of a wider group of children, on its own basis

What this number is not. A classification rate counts the students who had an IEP on one October day. It is not a count of how many students here need special education, and it is not a measure of the services they get. A rate above New Jersey’s can mean a district finds and identifies students that other districts miss, or that it classifies students another district would not; a rate below it can mean either of the opposite two things. This file cannot tell you which, and neither can this page.

Nothing here is evidence about staffing, spending, placement, out-of-district tuition, whether a program is appropriate, or whether the district is in compliance with anything. It is also not the special-education share in a district budget: that is a different count, of a different population, on a different date, and the two must not be subtracted from one another.

Some reporting units in this file are not ordinary districts. State-operated programs, county juvenile detention centers and specialized placements enroll students who were sent to them, which puts their rates far from the statewide figure for structural reasons rather than anything about how a district serves the children who live in it.

Every classification figure NJDOE has published for M E T S Charter, newest first, each row on the counted population that edition used. The New Jersey column is our own sum of that edition's district rows on the same basis, not a figure NJDOE printed.
October countStudents countedWith an IEPRateNew Jersey
2019-20 public school students only7127410.39%16.66%
2018-19 public and non-public students togetherWithheld *Withheld *Withheld *17.30%
2017-18 public and non-public students together7527710.24%16.98%
2016-17 public and non-public students together5145610.89%16.77%
2015-16 public and non-public students together4756112.84%16.50%
2014-15 public and non-public students together5345710.67%16.59%

About the oldest years. Rows marked † were matched to this district by NJDOE's district code, but our record of which districts existed does not reach back before August 2020. A match on those years confirms the code is in use today; it is not evidence that the entity behind it is the same district, and New Jersey has merged, split and regionalised districts across this span.

About the denominator. In most of these editions NJDOE headed the enrollment column General Ed. Enrollment or a variant of it, but the query the department published alongside the file counts every student aged 3 to 21 — students with IEPs included. The published rates only reconcile against that wider reading, so that is the denominator used here. Adding the IEP count back on would deflate every rate in the affected years.

What NJDOE publishes that is not in this workbook. The classification file answers one question — how many students had an IEP — and nothing else. It is not the only special-education file New Jersey publishes, and the others are not statewide-only:

  • Special Education Student Count — how many students have each disability. NJDOE publishes this by district in 11 of its editions, broken out by age, disability, gender, English-language status and race.
  • Education Environment (Placement) — how much of the day they spend in general-education classrooms. NJDOE publishes this by district in 11 of its editions, broken out by age, disability, gender, English-language status and race.
  • Exiting Special Education — how they leave special education. NJDOE publishes this by district in 11 of its editions, broken out by age, disability, gender, English-language status and race.

This site does not yet carry those figures. That is a gap in what we have loaded, not a gap in what the state publishes, and the difference matters if you came here looking for them.

Row Lea_classification_Pub.xlsx#Sheet1!329 of NJDOE’s classification-rate workbook. How this data works →

Graduation rate

In 2019-20, 77.6% of students graduated within four years — down from 94.9% in 2014-15.

% graduating 708510091%77.6%201420152016201720182019
This districtNew Jersey

† New Jersey says these years are not comparable with the ones beside them

  • 2019-20 — graduation assessment requirement waived. Graduation assessment requirements were waived for any 12th grade student who was expected to graduate in the class of 2020 but, as of March 18, 2020, had not yet met the graduation assessment requirement. Additionally, the requirement to report on status in meeting annual ESSA targets was waived for 2019-2020. As a result, annual targets and status in meeting those targets are not reported for Cohort 2019 4-year and Cohort 2018 5-year graduation rates (NJDOE uses prior year graduation rates for accountability purposes). NJDOE 2019-20 workbook notes sheet.

Four-year graduation rate — the share of a class that finishes within four years of entering ninth grade (New Jersey’s state calculation). The lighter line shows New Jersey, for comparison. The statewide line starts in 2018-19, because that is the first edition in which NJDOE printed a statewide rate beside each district’s own. Points from 2019-20 and earlier are matched to this district by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

Chronic absenteeism

In 2018-19, 21.9% of students were chronically absent — missing at least 10% of school days — up from 10.3% in 2016-17.

% chronically absent 01530notreported21.9%201620172018

Chronic absenteeism — the share of students who missed 10% or more of the days they were enrolled (roughly 18 days across a full school year). Points from 2018-19 and earlier are matched to this district by its state code; New Jersey’s organization record only reaches back to 2020-08-11, so for those years the code is verified and the identity behind it is not. Source: NJ School Performance Reports, 2015-16 through 2024-25.

Suspension here since 2017-18

New Jersey has published a district suspension figure in eight school years, 2017-18 through 2024-25. It published none before that: the 2015-16 edition has no district workbook at all and the 2016-17 one has no removals sheet in it. This district carries a figure in three of them, and two of those sit inside the part of the record New Jersey says can be compared. The two editions New Jersey excludes from that comparable record are shown here anyway, outside the line, in its own words. This district has no row at all in the 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25 files — it is absent from the publication, which is not the same as a year it recorded nothing.

percent of the district’s students suspended at least once0%5%10%NJDOE: not comparableNew Jersey2017-182018-192019-202020-21no row2021-22no row2022-23no row2023-24no row2024-25no row2.77.6

Each point is the share of this district’s own students suspended at least once that school year — one student counted once however many times they were suspended. The dashed line is New Jersey. The line stops at 2018-19 and starts again at 2021-22. The two years in between are drawn as hollow marks inside the shaded band because NJDOE printed, inside both of those workbooks, that their discipline data may not be comparable with the years either side — its words are below. Schools statewide were shut for part of spring 2020 and much of 2020-21, and the fall in those two years is very largely a fall in the number of children in a building, not in what they did. A year with no mark is a year New Jersey did not give this district a number; the table has which kind of not-giving it was.

2019-20, in New Jersey’s own words. Due to school closures in spring 2020, discipline data for the 2019-2020 school year may not be comparable to prior or future school years and NJDOE recommends caution in making comparisons.NJDOE, sheet “Important 2019-2020 Notes” inside the 2019-20 district and State data file. The sheet is not linked from the download page and nothing in the numbers hints that it exists.

Every edition, exactly as New Jersey printed it — including the changing number of decimal places, which is the publisher’s and not ours.
School yearShare suspendedStudentsWhere the figure sits in the file
2017-182.718the district’s own row
2018-1912.390the district’s own row
2019-207.649the district’s own row
2020-21No rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileNo rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileno row for this district
2021-22No rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileNo rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileno row for this district
2022-23No rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileNo rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileno row for this district
2023-24No rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileNo rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileno row for this district
2024-25No rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileNo rowthis district is not in that edition’s fileno row for this district

Where the figure sits in the file changed in 2023-24. Through 2022-23 the sheet had one row per district and this was that row; from 2023-24 the sheet is one row per student group and this is the group called Districtwide, then All Students. The quantity did not change and no break is drawn there — NJDOE prints it under the same column name, AnySusp_Count, in 2017-18 and again in 2024-25, with one edition in between spelling it #StudentsAnySuspension and then changing back.

What has a record, and how long

The same sheet carries seven measures and they do not all run the same length. Two of them stop after 2022-23: arrests moved to a sheet of their own that begins in 2023-24, and school days missed is not published anywhere any more.
MeasureEditionsSpan
Suspended at least oncethree2017-18 to 2019-20
In-school suspensionthree2017-18 to 2019-20
Out-of-school suspensionthree2017-18 to 2019-20
Removed to another programthree2017-18 to 2019-20
Expelledthree2017-18 to 2019-20
Involved in an incident leading to arrestthree2017-18 to 2019-20
School days missed to out-of-school suspensionthree2017-18 to 2019-20

What is not drawn here

There is no trend by student group, and this page does not draw one. New Jersey has published suspension broken out by race, sex, income and disability exactly twice — 2023-24 and 2024-25 — and it changed the categories between them. Asian and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander were separate groups in the first year and one merged group in the second; Hispanic became Hispanic/Latino; the district total was called Districtwide and is now All Students. Seven labels came through unchanged. Two points would not be a trend even if all fifteen had, and the two race categories cannot be added back together for the earlier year because either of them may be withheld. The section below shows the current year in full. When New Jersey publishes a third edition on the categories it uses now, this becomes a series and gets a chart; until then it is two years, and they are shown as two years.

The same boundary is why only suspension has a line above it. Students referred to police and students involved in an incident leading to arrest are published by student and by grade only from 2023-24, on sheets that did not exist before — and the arrest sheet names its own columns ArrestedCount in one edition and PoliceCount in the next. An arrest figure does appear on the removals sheet from 2017-18 to 2022-23, but joining it to the later sheet would be this site deciding that two differently-named columns on two different sheets are one measure, which is exactly the decision the publisher declined to make.

On reading one district back to 2017-18. The evidence that a district code names this district begins 2020-08-11. For the editions before that, a code that resolves is a verified code rather than a verified district: it says the number is a current NJDOE organization and says nothing about what that code named in that school year. New Jersey merges and regionalizes districts, so read the early end of this line as the record filed under this code, not as a promise that the same schools were inside it.

These are reported removals — a record of decisions adults made, one row per school year in eight separate publications. A district that suspends less may be behaving differently, recording differently, or reporting differently, and this file cannot tell a reader which. Nothing here is a safety measure or a measure of school quality, and no figure on this page is compared with a figure from any other dataset on it. Assembled from the eight district workbooks, most recently the School Performance Report data files. How this data works →

How the state has judged this district

2016-17 – 2024-25 · the ESSA record

Under ESSA, New Jersey rates schools, not districts. The calculation workbooks publish no district row at all, so there is no ESSA rating for this district to show. What there is: a published rating for individual schools here in every year the state calculated one, from 2016-17 to 2024-25. Each school’s own page carries its record.

How many of the 1 schools in this district NJDOE published a summative rating for, in each school year it calculated them.
School yearSchools with a published rating
2024-25None
2023-24None
2022-23None
2021-22None
2018-191
2017-181
2016-171

2019-20 and 2020-21 · nothing was calculated

These are not years missing from this record. The federal government waived New Jersey’s ESSA accountability requirements for both of them, and no summative rating exists for any school in the state. In NJDOE’s own words:

due to the COVID-19 pandemic, New Jersey was approved for both a March 2020 waiver and a March 2021 waiver that removed accountability-related requirements under ESSA for the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years, respectively. The waived requirements included the: Calculation of indicator scores and summative scores; Measurement of progress toward long-term goals and measures of interim progress for accountability indicators; and Identification of schools for comprehensive and targeted support and improvement based on data from these two school years.

2021-2022 Technical Guide to ESSA Summative Ratings and the Identification of Schools in Need of Support and Improvement, NJDOE April 2023, page 3

Everything below this line is a different instrument. Above, one weighted number and a rank inside a group of similar schools, under ESSA. Below, a pass-or-fail determination the state made about each student group, on tests that no longer exist, under a federal waiver that has since ended. The two regimes meet without a gap — 2015-16 is the last waiver year and 2016-17 the first ESSA one — and there is still no fair comparison between them, so this page does not draw one.

The waiver record. Annual editions between 2012 and 2016, most recent first. Read each band against itself and not against the others — the state changed what it measured, and how, twice inside those five years.

New Jersey’s ESEA Flexibility waiver ended after the 2016 edition, and the archive bundles for 2017 and 2018 return 404 on every build of the source release. That bounds the waiver record; it says nothing about the ESSA record above, which runs from 2016-17 without a break the state did not itself declare.

2015 – 2016 · participation only, on PARCC

New Jersey set no performance target and published no performance determination in these two editions — not for this district, and not for any school in the state. The tests changed to PARCC and the profiles print five columns where the earlier ones print seven, so what the state judged here is test participation and, below it, graduation and attendance. These two years are comparable with each other. Nothing here is a performance verdict, and the missing column is the state’s decision, not a gap in this record. YES* means something else here than it did through 2014. With no performance column to sit in, it appears in the participation column and marks a group whose participation rate was met with participation averaging applied.

2016 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about M E T S Charter in the 2016 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language Arts/LiteracyMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMet YES17.3%301 scoredMet YES10%309 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
AsianToo few students -30.7%26 scoredToo few students -26.9%26 scored
BlackMet YES13.7%102 scoredMet YES7.7%105 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES17.3%225 scoredMet YES10.1%227 scored
English Language Learnersrenamed from “Limited English Proficiency” this editionToo few students -0%5 scoredToo few students -0%5 scored
HispanicMet YES16.7%150 scoredMet YES8.4%155 scored
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%35 scoredToo few students -0%38 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
WhiteToo few students -19%21 scoredToo few students -14.3%21 scored
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2015 four-year bar or the 2014 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2015 four-year cohort, ≥81%2014 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideMet YESMet YES
BlackToo few students -Too few students -
Economically DisadvantagedMet YESMet YES
HispanicToo few students -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this district’s 2015 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole district and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2015 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about M E T S Charter in the 2015 edition. There is no performance column because the state published none.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% meeting standardsParticipation% meeting standards
SchoolwideMet YES25.4%304 scoredMet YES19.3%295 scored
American IndianToo few students -0%1 scoredToo few students -0%1 scored
AsianToo few students -61.1%36 scoredToo few students -58.1%31 scored
BlackMet YES17.8%118 scoredMet YES12%117 scored
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES21.3%211 scoredMet YES15.5%200 scored
HispanicMet YES21.8%110 scoredMet YES19.6%107 scored
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%2 scoredToo few students -0%2 scored
Students with DisabilitiesMet YES3.1%32 scoredMet YES0%33 scored
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students -0%0 scored
WhiteMet YES25.6%39 scoredMet YES10.3%39 scored
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2014 four-year bar or the 2013 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2014 four-year cohort, ≥78%2013 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideToo few students -
AsianToo few students -Too few students -
BlackToo few students -Too few students -
Economically DisadvantagedToo few students -
HispanicToo few students -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -
WhiteToo few students -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this district’s 2014 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole district and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

The regime changes here. Above this line the state judged participation alone; below it, participation and performance against an individually set target, on a different test. A determination on one side of this line cannot be compared with one on the other, so nothing on this page draws a line through it.

2012 – 2014 · progress targets, on NJASK and HSPA

Each group large enough to score was measured against a progress target set for it individually, on NJASK and HSPA. These three years are comparable with each other. Most cells are empty by design — a group below the state’s minimum size got no determination at all. YES* never means the target was met. In these editions it marks a group that missed the printed target and was credited inside a 95% confidence interval, and it appears in the performance column.

2014 unmarked

This edition asserts nothing about whether it is preliminary or final, so neither does this page. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about M E T S Charter in the 2014 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES50.8%122 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 55.6Met YES51.6%122 scoredMet its target YEStarget 47.5
American IndianToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianToo few students -79.3%29 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -93.1%29 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES42.3%45 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 47.6Met YES26.7%45 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 33.6
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES51.3%119 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 53Met YES53%119 scoredMet its target YEStarget 38.6
HispanicMet YES46.6%30 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 55.7Met YES50%30 scoredMet its target YEStarget 44.5
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -28.6%14 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -7.1%14 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -29.4%17 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -47.1%17 scoredToo few students to determine -
Graduation rate. The state credited a group that cleared the 2013 four-year bar or the 2012 five-year bar; both inputs and the indicator they fed are shown separately, because which route the state took is the thing worth seeing. Most rows print only the four-year column — a dash in the five-year column means the state printed nothing there, not that the group failed.
Student group2013 four-year cohort, ≥78%2012 five-year cohort, ≥85%Graduation-rate indicator
SchoolwideToo few students -
BlackToo few students -Too few students -
Economically DisadvantagedToo few students -
HispanicToo few students -

Attendance, grades 3 through 8. New Jersey asked whether this district’s 2013 attendance rate reached 90%, once for the whole district and not by student group. It met it — the page prints YES, Met.

2013 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about M E T S Charter in the 2013 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupEnglish Language ArtsMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES46.8%141 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 51.2Met YES36.9%141 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 42.2
American IndianToo few students -100%1 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%1 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianMet YES67.8%28 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES75%28 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES37%54 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 42.3Met YES20.4%54 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 27
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES43.6%87 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 48.3Met YES26.4%87 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 32.5
HispanicMet YES46.7%45 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 51.2Met YES33.3%45 scoredMissed its target, credited within a 95% confidence interval YES*target 38.9
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -23.1%13 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%13 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -38.5%13 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -38.5%13 scoredToo few students to determine -
Graduation rate, 2012 four-year cohort. This edition prints rates rather than determinations.
Student group2012 four-year graduation rate
Schoolwide
American Indian
Asian
Black
Economically Disadvantaged
Hispanic
Limited English Proficiency
Students with Disabilities
Two or More Races
White

These are the rates the state printed, not determinations: this edition’s district profiles carry no YES or NO on graduation. Printed beside the block: “5yr Cohort Grad rate and Attendance rate will be included in Final District Profiles.” No final 2013 district profile was ever published.

2012 preliminary

New Jersey labelled this edition preliminary, and never published a final one. A dash means the group was below the state’s own minimum size — 40 students for participation, 30 for performance — so nothing was determined for it at all.

What New Jersey determined about M E T S Charter in the 2012 edition, group by group and subject by subject, exactly as it printed it.
Student groupLanguage Arts LiteracyMathematics
Participation% proficientPerformanceParticipation% proficientPerformance
SchoolwideMet YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
American IndianToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
AsianMet YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
BlackMet YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Economically DisadvantagedMet YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
HispanicMet YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Met YES0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Limited English ProficiencyToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Students with DisabilitiesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
Two or More RacesToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -
WhiteToo few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -Too few students -0%0 scoredToo few students to determine -

The waiver determinations are what New Jersey printed on this district’s annual ESEA accountability profile, kept exactly as printed and corrected from nothing. Each edition’s glyphs are read against that edition’s own legend, because the same asterisk means different things in different years. Editions this district does not appear in are simply absent here; no year is inferred from its neighbours. Source: NJDOE’s Title I accountability archive, 2012–2016.

How the ESSA record works →  ·  How the 2012–2016 waiver record works →

Schools in this district

The district’s 1 schools on record. Open any for its full profile.

Every school the district has reported, with its grade span and its most recent fall head count; a school with no current-year count is shown as closed after its last one. Source: NJDOE Fall Enrollment.

Profile built from New Jersey Department of Education Fall Enrollment data, 1998-99 through 2025-26. How this data works →